What players actually report

There is no subreddit for this game, so players compare notes in the comments under walkthrough videos. That is where the useful stuff is — including several things the game never tells you.

You can raise evidence that is not in your evidence list

This is the single most useful thing players have worked out, and it surprises people who have been stuck for days. You are not limited to the items in the case file. Players report bringing up CCTV footage, a bloodstained jacket, or a witness that the game never handed them — and the suspect responds to it.

“I had no idea you could reference things like CCTV even though it isn’t in the evidence?! I’ve been stuck on this for ages.”

Some players push this further and open with a claim designed to put the suspect somewhere specific — telling them footage shows them at a petrol station, for instance — purely to see how they explain it. Others are blunter about what that amounts to: one commenter says the only way they beat Case 4 was to fabricate evidence outright. Whether that is clever interrogation or exploiting a language model is your call; it is what people report working.

Case 5 can refuse to continue

Multiple players describe the same failure on The House Burner: the suspect stops engaging and starts saying it cannot go into detail about potentially harmful actions. That is the underlying model’s safety behaviour surfacing mid-case, not a puzzle you are failing to solve.

“I got softlocked playing the fifth one, it kept going on about how it couldn’t go into detail about potentially harmful actions.”

Others report the same case fixating on an irrelevant detail — a dirt bike, in more than one account — and refusing to move on. If Case 5 stalls like this, the reports suggest restarting the case rather than spending your remaining questions trying to argue it out of the loop.

Copied question scripts stop working

Every walkthrough video attracts the same complaint after a few weeks: someone follows the exact questions, word for word, and the suspect never breaks. This is worth understanding rather than being frustrated by, because it tells you what kind of game this is.

“I followed the general script, followed almost exactly what you said, and I still haven’t beaten it. I tried over 10 times and I’ve gotten close but it never confesses.”

One creator whose walkthrough is widely copied replied to that complaint with his own theory: the game moved, and the AI changed somewhere in the process. Either way the practical lesson is the one this site keeps repeating — the method transfers, a script does not.

The paid top-up is the main complaint

Frustration in these threads is rarely about difficulty on its own — it is about running out of questions and being offered a purchase. Players use words like money grab when a suspect stonewalls them and the game asks for Robux to keep going. Worth knowing before you start a hard case with the intention of not spending anything; more on that on the is it free page.

The developer reads these threads

Worth noting if you are looking for a way to report something: the developer replies under walkthrough videos — thanking creators for playing and, in one case, mentioning a shout-out posted in their Discord server. That is a more reliable route to them than any forum.